CCTV & Surveillance

Body-Worn Video for Security Guards: Legal Use and Best Practice

9 min read· Updated 2026-07-07· Free · No signup

Body-worn video is now a baseline expectation on most licensed premises and event contracts. Used well it reduces complaints, supports prosecutions, and protects the wearer. Used badly it creates GDPR breaches and evidence problems.

Key takeaways

  • Announce recording clearly.
  • Continuous recording vs event recording — know your site's policy.
  • Battery discipline: charge every shift.
  • Footage handover to a locked repository within the shift.

Legal basis in one paragraph

Recording is processing under GDPR. Lawful basis is usually legitimate interest, balanced against the individual. Signage, policy, retention limits and access controls make it defensible.

Announcing the record

'This interaction is being recorded on body-worn video for your safety and mine.' Simple, calm, non-threatening. Behaviour usually improves immediately.

Post-shift

Docking station handover, no personal-device transfer, no cloud upload outside employer-approved system. Any deviation is a data breach in waiting.

Quick checklist

  • Camera charged at shift start
  • Announcement rehearsed
  • Retention and access policy known
  • Docked to employer system at end of shift

Common mistakes

  • Emailing clips to yourself.
  • Recording covertly without lawful basis.

Frequently asked questions

Do I record continuously or only on incident?+

Event-based (activate on incident) is more common and better for privacy. Continuous is for specific high-risk contexts.

Can the person recorded demand a copy?+

Via Subject Access Request under UK GDPR. Route to DPO.

Related guides